token.app › Compare › Beam 1.0 501B A23B vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Beam 1.0 501B A23B vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is 8.0× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Beam 1.0 501B A23B accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Beam 1.0 501B A23B | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Reflection | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $0.250 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $1.00 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.438 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1M |
| Max output | 131K | 66K |
| Released | Oct 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Beam 1.0 501B A23B if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Open weights — self-hostable
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.438 blended
FAQ
Which is better, Beam 1.0 501B A23B or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Beam 1.0 501B A23B and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Beam 1.0 501B A23B cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.438 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.250 vs $0.030. Output alone: $1.00 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Beam 1.0 501B A23B and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Beam 1.0 501B A23B: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Beam 1.0 501B A23B and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Beam 1.0 501B A23B is made by Reflection. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons