token.app โ€บ Compare โ€บ Claude 3 Haiku vs Phi 4

Claude 3 Haiku vs Phi 4

Phi 4 leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Phi 4 is 5.7ร— cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Claude 3 Haiku accepts the larger context window (200K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Claude 3 HaikuPhi 4
ProviderAnthropicMicrosoft
Input $/1M$0.250$0.070
Output $/1M$1.25$0.140
Blended $/1M$0.500$0.088
Context window200K16K
Max output4K16K
ReleasedMar 2024Jan 2025
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
GPQA Diamond 36.3% 56.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 1.8% 13.8%
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Claude 3 Haiku ifโ€ฆ
  • Larger context window (200K)
Choose Phi 4 ifโ€ฆ
  • Costs less per token โ€” $0.088 vs $0.500 blended
  • Higher GPQA Diamond (56.1% vs 36.3%)
  • Higher OTIS Mock AIME (13.8% vs 1.8%)
  • Open weights โ€” self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Jan 2025)
FAQ
Which is better, Claude 3 Haiku or Phi 4?
Across the 2 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, Claude 3 Haiku leads on 0 and Phi 4 leads on 2. Benchmarks are one input โ€” price and context window are on this page too.
Is Claude 3 Haiku cheaper than Phi 4?
Phi 4 is cheaper: $0.088 versus $0.500 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.250 vs $0.070. Output alone: $1.25 vs $0.140.
What context windows do Claude 3 Haiku and Phi 4 have?
Claude 3 Haiku: 200,000 tokens. Phi 4: 16,384 tokens.
Who makes Claude 3 Haiku and Phi 4?
Claude 3 Haiku is made by Anthropic. Phi 4 is made by Microsoft.
Related comparisons