token.app › Compare › Claude Fable 5 (batch) vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Claude Fable 5 (batch) vs GPT-5.6 Luna

GPT-5.6 Luna is 44× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. GPT-5.6 Luna accepts the larger context window (1.1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Claude Fable 5 (batch)GPT-5.6 Luna
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Input $/1M$5.00$0.100
Output $/1M$25.00$0.600
Blended $/1M$10.00$0.225
Context window1M1.1M
Max output128K128K
ReleasedJun 2026Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Claude Fable 5 (batch) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose GPT-5.6 Luna if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.225 vs $10.00 blended
  • Larger context window (1.1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Claude Fable 5 (batch) or GPT-5.6 Luna?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Claude Fable 5 (batch) and GPT-5.6 Luna, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Claude Fable 5 (batch) cheaper than GPT-5.6 Luna?
GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper: $0.225 versus $10.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $5.00 vs $0.100. Output alone: $25.00 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Claude Fable 5 (batch) and GPT-5.6 Luna have?
Claude Fable 5 (batch): 1,000,000 tokens. GPT-5.6 Luna: 1,050,000 tokens.
Who makes Claude Fable 5 (batch) and GPT-5.6 Luna?
Claude Fable 5 (batch) is made by Anthropic. GPT-5.6 Luna is made by OpenAI.
Related comparisons
Claude Fable 5 (batch) full details GPT-5.6 Luna full details Claude Fable 5 (batch) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Claude Fable 5 (batch) vs Muse Spark 1.2 Claude Fable 5 (batch) vs Qwen3.8 Max Claude Fable 5 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Claude Fable 5 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Claude Fable 5 (batch) vs Inkling Small