token.app › Compare › Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) vs Inkling Small

Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) vs Inkling Small

Inkling Small is 16× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Claude Fable 5.1 (batch)Inkling Small
ProviderAnthropicThinkingmachines
Input $/1M$5.00$0.450
Output $/1M$25.00$1.20
Blended $/1M$10.00$0.637
Context window1M524K
Max output128K262K
ReleasedSep 2026Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) if…
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Sep 2026)
Choose Inkling Small if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.637 vs $10.00 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
FAQ
Which is better, Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) or Inkling Small?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) and Inkling Small, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) cheaper than Inkling Small?
Inkling Small is cheaper: $0.637 versus $10.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $5.00 vs $0.450. Output alone: $25.00 vs $1.20.
What context windows do Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) and Inkling Small have?
Claude Fable 5.1 (batch): 1,000,000 tokens. Inkling Small: 524,288 tokens.
Who makes Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) and Inkling Small?
Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) is made by Anthropic. Inkling Small is made by Thinkingmachines.
Related comparisons
Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) full details Inkling Small full details Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) vs Flint (free) Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) vs Glimpse Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B