token.app › Compare › Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is 182× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis.

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Claude Fable 5.1 (batch)Qwen3.7 Flash
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba
Input $/1M$5.00$0.030
Output $/1M$25.00$0.130
Blended $/1M$10.00$0.055
Context window1M1M
Max output128K66K
ReleasedSep 2026Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) if…
  • Newer model (released Sep 2026)
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $10.00 blended
FAQ
Which is better, Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $10.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $5.00 vs $0.030. Output alone: $25.00 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Claude Fable 5.1 (batch): 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) is made by Anthropic. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons
Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) full details Qwen3.7 Flash full details Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) vs Flint (free) Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) vs Glimpse Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Claude Fable 5.1 (batch) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B