token.app › Compare › Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 76× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Claude Fable 5.1 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
| Input $/1M | $10.00 | $0.150 |
| Output $/1M | $50.00 | $0.600 |
| Blended $/1M | $20.00 | $0.262 |
| Context window | 1M | 1.0M |
| Max output | 128K | 393K |
| Released | Sep 2026 | Oct 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Open weights |
Choose Claude Fable 5.1 if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
- Costs less per token — $0.262 vs $20.00 blended
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Open weights — self-hostable
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Claude Fable 5.1 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Claude Fable 5.1 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Claude Fable 5.1 cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is cheaper: $0.262 versus $20.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $10.00 vs $0.150. Output alone: $50.00 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Claude Fable 5.1 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Claude Fable 5.1: 1,000,000 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Claude Fable 5.1 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Claude Fable 5.1 is made by Anthropic. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons