token.app › Compare › Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 3.8× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch)DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProviderAnthropicDeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.500$0.150
Output $/1M$2.50$0.600
Blended $/1M$1.00$0.262
Context window200K1.0M
Max output64K393K
ReleasedOct 2025Oct 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.262 vs $1.00 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is cheaper: $0.262 versus $1.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.500 vs $0.150. Output alone: $2.50 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch): 200,000 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) is made by Anthropic. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons
Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) full details DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 full details Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Flint (free) Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Glimpse Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Mercury 3