token.app › Compare › Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is 36× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $1.00 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $5.00 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $2.00 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 200K | 1M |
| Max output | 64K | 66K |
| Released | Oct 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $2.00 blended
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $2.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $1.00 vs $0.030. Output alone: $5.00 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Claude Haiku 4.5: 200,000 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Claude Haiku 4.5 is made by Anthropic. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons