token.app › Compare › Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is 1.8× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis.

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch)Qwen3.7 Flash
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba
Input $/1M$0.050$0.030
Output $/1M$0.250$0.130
Blended $/1M$0.100$0.055
Context window1M1M
Max output128K66K
ReleasedOct 2026Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) if…
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.100 blended
FAQ
Which is better, Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.100 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.050 vs $0.030. Output alone: $0.250 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch): 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) is made by Anthropic. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons
Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) full details Qwen3.7 Flash full details Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) vs Flint (free) Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) vs Glimpse Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B