token.app › Compare › Claude Haiku Latest vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Claude Haiku Latest vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Claude Haiku Latest is 1.3× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Claude Haiku LatestDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProviderAnthropicDeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.100$0.150
Output $/1M$0.500$0.600
Blended $/1M$0.200$0.262
Context window1M1.0M
Max output128K393K
ReleasedApr 2026Oct 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Claude Haiku Latest if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.200 vs $0.262 blended
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Claude Haiku Latest or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Claude Haiku Latest and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Claude Haiku Latest cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Claude Haiku Latest is cheaper: $0.200 versus $0.262 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.100 vs $0.150. Output alone: $0.500 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Claude Haiku Latest and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Claude Haiku Latest: 1,000,000 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Claude Haiku Latest and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Claude Haiku Latest is made by Anthropic. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons
Claude Haiku Latest full details DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 full details Claude Haiku Latest vs Flint (free) Claude Haiku Latest vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Claude Haiku Latest vs Glimpse Claude Haiku Latest vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Claude Haiku Latest vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B Claude Haiku Latest vs Mercury 3