token.app › Compare › Claude Opus 4.1 (batch) vs Inkling

Claude Opus 4.1 (batch) vs Inkling

Inkling is 8.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Inkling accepts the larger context window (524K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Claude Opus 4.1 (batch)Inkling
ProviderAnthropicThinkingmachines
Input $/1M$7.50$1.00
Output $/1M$37.50$4.05
Blended $/1M$15.00$1.76
Context window200K524K
Max output32K472K
ReleasedAug 2025Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Claude Opus 4.1 (batch) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Inkling if…
  • Costs less per token — $1.76 vs $15.00 blended
  • Larger context window (524K)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.1 (batch) or Inkling?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Claude Opus 4.1 (batch) and Inkling, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Claude Opus 4.1 (batch) cheaper than Inkling?
Inkling is cheaper: $1.76 versus $15.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $7.50 vs $1.00. Output alone: $37.50 vs $4.05.
What context windows do Claude Opus 4.1 (batch) and Inkling have?
Claude Opus 4.1 (batch): 200,000 tokens. Inkling: 524,288 tokens.
Who makes Claude Opus 4.1 (batch) and Inkling?
Claude Opus 4.1 (batch) is made by Anthropic. Inkling is made by Thinkingmachines.
Related comparisons
Claude Opus 4.1 (batch) full details Inkling full details Claude Opus 4.1 (batch) vs Flint (free) Claude Opus 4.1 (batch) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Claude Opus 4.1 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Claude Opus 4.1 (batch) vs Glimpse Claude Opus 4.1 (batch) vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Claude Opus 4.1 (batch) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B