token.app › Compare › Claude Opus 4.5 (batch) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)

Claude Opus 4.5 (batch) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)

Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) is free to use, against $5.00 per million tokens. Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) accepts the larger context window (262K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Claude Opus 4.5 (batch)Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)
ProviderAnthropicInclusionai
Input $/1M$2.50Free
Output $/1M$12.50Free
Blended $/1M$5.00Free
Context window200K262K
Max output64K33K
ReleasedNov 2025Aug 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Claude Opus 4.5 (batch) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) if…
  • Costs less per token — Free vs $5.00 blended
  • Larger context window (262K)
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.5 (batch) or Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Claude Opus 4.5 (batch) and Ling 3.0 Tiny (free), so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Claude Opus 4.5 (batch) cheaper than Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)?
Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) is cheaper: Free versus $5.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $2.50 vs Free. Output alone: $12.50 vs Free.
What context windows do Claude Opus 4.5 (batch) and Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) have?
Claude Opus 4.5 (batch): 200,000 tokens. Ling 3.0 Tiny (free): 262,144 tokens.
Who makes Claude Opus 4.5 (batch) and Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)?
Claude Opus 4.5 (batch) is made by Anthropic. Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) is made by Inclusionai.
Related comparisons
Claude Opus 4.5 (batch) full details Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) full details Claude Opus 4.5 (batch) vs Muse Spark 1.2 Claude Opus 4.5 (batch) vs Qwen3.8 Max Claude Opus 4.5 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Claude Opus 4.5 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Claude Opus 4.5 (batch) vs Inkling Small Claude Opus 4.5 (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash