token.app › Compare › Claude Opus 4.5 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Claude Opus 4.5 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is 182× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Claude Opus 4.5 | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $5.00 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $25.00 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $10.00 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 200K | 1M |
| Max output | 64K | 66K |
| Released | Nov 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Choose Claude Opus 4.5 if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $10.00 blended
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.5 or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Claude Opus 4.5 and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Claude Opus 4.5 cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $10.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $5.00 vs $0.030. Output alone: $25.00 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Claude Opus 4.5 and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Claude Opus 4.5: 200,000 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Claude Opus 4.5 and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Claude Opus 4.5 is made by Anthropic. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.