token.app › Compare › Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is 91× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis.

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Claude Opus 4.7 (batch)Qwen3.7 Flash
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba
Input $/1M$2.50$0.030
Output $/1M$12.50$0.130
Blended $/1M$5.00$0.055
Context window1M1M
Max output128K66K
ReleasedApr 2026Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $5.00 blended
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $5.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $2.50 vs $0.030. Output alone: $12.50 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Claude Opus 4.7 (batch): 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) is made by Anthropic. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons
Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) full details Qwen3.7 Flash full details Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) vs Muse Spark 1.2 Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) vs Qwen3.8 Max Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Claude Opus 4.7 (batch) vs Inkling Small