token.app › Compare › Claude Sonnet 4 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Claude Sonnet 4 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Gemini 3.6 Flash is 2.0× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.6 Flash accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Claude Sonnet 4Gemini 3.6 Flash
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Input $/1M$3.00$1.50
Output $/1M$15.00$7.50
Blended $/1M$6.00$3.00
Context window1M1.0M
Max output64K66K
ReleasedMay 2025Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
GPQA Diamond 79.2% 94.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 71.1% 94.2%
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Claude Sonnet 4 if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Gemini 3.6 Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $3.00 vs $6.00 blended
  • Higher GPQA Diamond (94.1% vs 79.2%)
  • Higher OTIS Mock AIME (94.2% vs 71.1%)
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4 or Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Across the 2 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, Claude Sonnet 4 leads on 0 and Gemini 3.6 Flash leads on 2. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is Claude Sonnet 4 cheaper than Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Gemini 3.6 Flash is cheaper: $3.00 versus $6.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $3.00 vs $1.50. Output alone: $15.00 vs $7.50.
What context windows do Claude Sonnet 4 and Gemini 3.6 Flash have?
Claude Sonnet 4: 1,000,000 tokens. Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Claude Sonnet 4 and Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Claude Sonnet 4 is made by Anthropic. Gemini 3.6 Flash is made by Google.
Related comparisons