token.app › Compare › Claude Sonnet 4.5 (batch) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)

Claude Sonnet 4.5 (batch) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)

Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) is free to use, against $3.00 per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.5 (batch) accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Claude Sonnet 4.5 (batch)Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)
ProviderAnthropicInclusionai
Input $/1M$1.50Free
Output $/1M$7.50Free
Blended $/1M$3.00Free
Context window1M262K
Max output64K33K
ReleasedSep 2025Aug 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Claude Sonnet 4.5 (batch) if…
  • Larger context window (1M)
Choose Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) if…
  • Costs less per token — Free vs $3.00 blended
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4.5 (batch) or Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Claude Sonnet 4.5 (batch) and Ling 3.0 Tiny (free), so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 (batch) cheaper than Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)?
Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) is cheaper: Free versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $1.50 vs Free. Output alone: $7.50 vs Free.
What context windows do Claude Sonnet 4.5 (batch) and Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) have?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 (batch): 1,000,000 tokens. Ling 3.0 Tiny (free): 262,144 tokens.
Who makes Claude Sonnet 4.5 (batch) and Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 (batch) is made by Anthropic. Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) is made by Inclusionai.
Related comparisons
Claude Sonnet 4.5 (batch) full details Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) full details Claude Sonnet 4.5 (batch) vs Muse Spark 1.2 Claude Sonnet 4.5 (batch) vs Qwen3.8 Max Claude Sonnet 4.5 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Claude Sonnet 4.5 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Claude Sonnet 4.5 (batch) vs Inkling Small Claude Sonnet 4.5 (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash