token.app › Compare › Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Glimpse

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Glimpse

Glimpse is 2.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch)Glimpse
ProviderAnthropicElorian
Input $/1M$1.50$0.600
Output $/1M$7.50$3.00
Blended $/1M$3.00$1.20
Context window1M262K
Max output128K256K
ReleasedFeb 2026Oct 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) if…
  • Larger context window (1M)
Choose Glimpse if…
  • Costs less per token — $1.20 vs $3.00 blended
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) or Glimpse?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) and Glimpse, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) cheaper than Glimpse?
Glimpse is cheaper: $1.20 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $1.50 vs $0.600. Output alone: $7.50 vs $3.00.
What context windows do Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) and Glimpse have?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch): 1,000,000 tokens. Glimpse: 262,144 tokens.
Who makes Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) and Glimpse?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) is made by Anthropic. Glimpse is made by Elorian.
Related comparisons
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) full details Glimpse full details Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Flint (free) Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B Claude Sonnet 4.6 (batch) vs Mercury 3