token.app › Compare › Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is 2.4× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Claude Sonnet 5 (batch)Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Input $/1M$1.00$0.300
Output $/1M$5.00$2.50
Blended $/1M$2.00$0.850
Context window1M1.0M
Max output128K66K
ReleasedJun 2026Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.850 vs $2.00 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper: $0.850 versus $2.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $1.00 vs $0.300. Output alone: $5.00 vs $2.50.
What context windows do Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite have?
Claude Sonnet 5 (batch): 1,000,000 tokens. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) is made by Anthropic. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is made by Google.
Related comparisons
Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) full details Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite full details Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) vs Flint (free) Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) vs Glimpse Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B