token.app › Compare › Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is 36× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis.

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Claude Sonnet 5 (batch)Qwen3.7 Flash
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba
Input $/1M$1.00$0.030
Output $/1M$5.00$0.130
Blended $/1M$2.00$0.055
Context window1M1M
Max output128K66K
ReleasedJun 2026Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $2.00 blended
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $2.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $1.00 vs $0.030. Output alone: $5.00 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Claude Sonnet 5 (batch): 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) is made by Anthropic. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons
Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) full details Qwen3.7 Flash full details Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) vs Muse Spark 1.2 Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) vs Qwen3.8 Max Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) vs Inkling Small