token.app › Compare › Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Beam 1.0 501B A23B is 4.6× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Beam 1.0 501B A23B accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch)Beam 1.0 501B A23B
ProviderAnthropicReflection
Input $/1M$1.00$0.250
Output $/1M$5.00$1.00
Blended $/1M$2.00$0.438
Context window1M1.0M
Max output128K131K
ReleasedSep 2026Oct 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Beam 1.0 501B A23B if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.438 vs $2.00 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) and Beam 1.0 501B A23B, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Beam 1.0 501B A23B is cheaper: $0.438 versus $2.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $1.00 vs $0.250. Output alone: $5.00 vs $1.00.
What context windows do Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) and Beam 1.0 501B A23B have?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch): 1,000,000 tokens. Beam 1.0 501B A23B: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) and Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) is made by Anthropic. Beam 1.0 501B A23B is made by Reflection.
Related comparisons
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) full details Beam 1.0 501B A23B full details Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Flint (free) Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Glimpse Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Mercury 3