token.app › Compare › Claude Sonnet Latest vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Claude Sonnet Latest vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Beam 1.0 501B A23B is 9.1× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Beam 1.0 501B A23B accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Claude Sonnet LatestBeam 1.0 501B A23B
ProviderAnthropicReflection
Input $/1M$2.00$0.250
Output $/1M$10.00$1.00
Blended $/1M$4.00$0.438
Context window1M1.0M
Max output128K131K
ReleasedApr 2026Oct 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Claude Sonnet Latest if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Beam 1.0 501B A23B if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.438 vs $4.00 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Claude Sonnet Latest or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Claude Sonnet Latest and Beam 1.0 501B A23B, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Claude Sonnet Latest cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Beam 1.0 501B A23B is cheaper: $0.438 versus $4.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $2.00 vs $0.250. Output alone: $10.00 vs $1.00.
What context windows do Claude Sonnet Latest and Beam 1.0 501B A23B have?
Claude Sonnet Latest: 1,000,000 tokens. Beam 1.0 501B A23B: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Claude Sonnet Latest and Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Claude Sonnet Latest is made by Anthropic. Beam 1.0 501B A23B is made by Reflection.
Related comparisons
Claude Sonnet Latest full details Beam 1.0 501B A23B full details Claude Sonnet Latest vs Flint (free) Claude Sonnet Latest vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Claude Sonnet Latest vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Claude Sonnet Latest vs Glimpse Claude Sonnet Latest vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Claude Sonnet Latest vs Mercury 3