token.app › Compare › Codestral 2508 vs Flint (free)
Codestral 2508 vs Flint (free)
Flint (free) is free to use, against $0.450 per million tokens. Flint (free) accepts the larger context window (262K).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Codestral 2508 | Flint (free) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Recursive |
| Input $/1M | $0.300 | Free |
| Output $/1M | $0.900 | Free |
| Blended $/1M | $0.450 | Free |
| Context window | 256K | 262K |
| Max output | 205K | 236K |
| Released | Aug 2025 | Oct 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Open weights |
Choose Codestral 2508 if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Flint (free) if…
- Costs less per token — Free vs $0.450 blended
- Larger context window (262K)
- Open weights — self-hostable
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Codestral 2508 or Flint (free)?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Codestral 2508 and Flint (free), so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Codestral 2508 cheaper than Flint (free)?
Flint (free) is cheaper: Free versus $0.450 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.300 vs Free. Output alone: $0.900 vs Free.
What context windows do Codestral 2508 and Flint (free) have?
Codestral 2508: 256,000 tokens. Flint (free): 262,144 tokens.
Who makes Codestral 2508 and Flint (free)?
Codestral 2508 is made by Mistral AI. Flint (free) is made by Recursive.