token.app › Compare › Command A+ vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Command A+ vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is 11× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Command A+ | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $0.300 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $1.50 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.600 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 192K | 1M |
| Max output | 64K | 66K |
| Released | Sep 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Choose Command A+ if…
- Newer model (released Sep 2026)
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.600 blended
- Larger context window (1M)
FAQ
Which is better, Command A+ or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Command A+ and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Command A+ cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.600 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.300 vs $0.030. Output alone: $1.50 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Command A+ and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Command A+: 192,000 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Command A+ and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Command A+ is made by Cohere. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.