token.app › Compare › Command A vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Command A vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 17× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Command A | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | DeepSeek |
| Input $/1M | $2.50 | $0.150 |
| Output $/1M | $10.00 | $0.600 |
| Blended $/1M | $4.38 | $0.262 |
| Context window | 256K | 1.0M |
| Max output | 8K | 393K |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Oct 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
Choose Command A if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
- Costs less per token — $0.262 vs $4.38 blended
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Command A or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Command A and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Command A cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is cheaper: $0.262 versus $4.38 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $2.50 vs $0.150. Output alone: $10.00 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Command A and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Command A: 256,000 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Command A and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Command A is made by Cohere. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.