token.app › Compare › Command R (08-2024) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

Command R (08-2024) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is 2.3× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Command R (08-2024)DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
ProviderCohereDeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.150$0.090
Output $/1M$0.600$0.180
Blended $/1M$0.262$0.113
Context window128K1.0M
Max output4K384K
ReleasedAug 2024Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Command R (08-2024) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.113 vs $0.262 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Command R (08-2024) or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Command R (08-2024) and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Command R (08-2024) cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper: $0.113 versus $0.262 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.150 vs $0.090. Output alone: $0.600 vs $0.180.
What context windows do Command R (08-2024) and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 have?
Command R (08-2024): 128,000 tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Command R (08-2024) and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
Command R (08-2024) is made by Cohere. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons
Command R (08-2024) full details DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 full details Command R (08-2024) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Command R (08-2024) vs Muse Spark 1.2 Command R (08-2024) vs Qwen3.8 Max Command R (08-2024) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Command R (08-2024) vs Inkling Small Command R (08-2024) vs Qwen3.7 Flash