token.app › Compare › Command R (08-2024) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Command R (08-2024) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is 4.8× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Command R (08-2024)Qwen3.7 Flash
ProviderCohereAlibaba
Input $/1M$0.150$0.030
Output $/1M$0.600$0.130
Blended $/1M$0.262$0.055
Context window128K1M
Max output4K66K
ReleasedAug 2024Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Command R (08-2024) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.262 blended
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Command R (08-2024) or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Command R (08-2024) and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Command R (08-2024) cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.262 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.150 vs $0.030. Output alone: $0.600 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Command R (08-2024) and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Command R (08-2024): 128,000 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Command R (08-2024) and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Command R (08-2024) is made by Cohere. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons
Command R (08-2024) full details Qwen3.7 Flash full details Command R (08-2024) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Command R (08-2024) vs Muse Spark 1.2 Command R (08-2024) vs Qwen3.8 Max Command R (08-2024) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Command R (08-2024) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Command R (08-2024) vs Inkling Small