token.app › Compare › Command R+ (08-2024) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Command R+ (08-2024) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 17× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Command R+ (08-2024)DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProviderCohereDeepSeek
Input $/1M$2.50$0.150
Output $/1M$10.00$0.600
Blended $/1M$4.38$0.262
Context window128K1.0M
Max output4K393K
ReleasedAug 2024Oct 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Command R+ (08-2024) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.262 vs $4.38 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Command R+ (08-2024) or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Command R+ (08-2024) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Command R+ (08-2024) cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is cheaper: $0.262 versus $4.38 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $2.50 vs $0.150. Output alone: $10.00 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Command R+ (08-2024) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Command R+ (08-2024): 128,000 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Command R+ (08-2024) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Command R+ (08-2024) is made by Cohere. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons
Command R+ (08-2024) full details DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 full details Command R+ (08-2024) vs Flint (free) Command R+ (08-2024) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Command R+ (08-2024) vs Glimpse Command R+ (08-2024) vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Command R+ (08-2024) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B Command R+ (08-2024) vs Mercury 3