token.app › Compare › R1 0528 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

R1 0528 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Beam 1.0 501B A23B is 2.1× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Beam 1.0 501B A23B accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
R1 0528Beam 1.0 501B A23B
ProviderDeepSeekReflection
Input $/1M$0.500$0.250
Output $/1M$2.15$1.00
Blended $/1M$0.912$0.438
Context window164K1.0M
Max output33K131K
ReleasedMay 2025Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose R1 0528 if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Beam 1.0 501B A23B if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.438 vs $0.912 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, R1 0528 or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both R1 0528 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is R1 0528 cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Beam 1.0 501B A23B is cheaper: $0.438 versus $0.912 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.500 vs $0.250. Output alone: $2.15 vs $1.00.
What context windows do R1 0528 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B have?
R1 0528: 163,840 tokens. Beam 1.0 501B A23B: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes R1 0528 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
R1 0528 is made by DeepSeek. Beam 1.0 501B A23B is made by Reflection.
Related comparisons