token.app › Compare › R1 Distill Llama 70B vs Qwen3.7 Flash

R1 Distill Llama 70B vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is 15× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
R1 Distill Llama 70BQwen3.7 Flash
ProviderDeepSeekAlibaba
Input $/1M$0.800$0.030
Output $/1M$0.800$0.130
Blended $/1M$0.800$0.055
Context window8K1M
Max output8K66K
ReleasedJan 2025Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose R1 Distill Llama 70B if…
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.800 blended
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, R1 Distill Llama 70B or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both R1 Distill Llama 70B and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is R1 Distill Llama 70B cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.800 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.800 vs $0.030. Output alone: $0.800 vs $0.130.
What context windows do R1 Distill Llama 70B and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
R1 Distill Llama 70B: 8,192 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes R1 Distill Llama 70B and Qwen3.7 Flash?
R1 Distill Llama 70B is made by DeepSeek. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons