token.app › Compare › DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Inkling Small

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Inkling Small

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is 1.4× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Inkling Small accepts the larger context window (524K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
DeepSeek V3.1 TerminusInkling Small
ProviderDeepSeekThinkingmachines
Input $/1M$0.270$0.450
Output $/1M$1.00$1.20
Blended $/1M$0.453$0.637
Context window164K524K
Max output33K262K
ReleasedSep 2025Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.453 vs $0.637 blended
Choose Inkling Small if…
  • Larger context window (524K)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Inkling Small?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Inkling Small, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus cheaper than Inkling Small?
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is cheaper: $0.453 versus $0.637 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.270 vs $0.450. Output alone: $1.00 vs $1.20.
What context windows do DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Inkling Small have?
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus: 163,840 tokens. Inkling Small: 524,288 tokens.
Who makes DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Inkling Small?
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is made by DeepSeek. Inkling Small is made by Thinkingmachines.
Related comparisons
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus full details Inkling Small full details DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Muse Spark 1.2 DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Qwen3.8 Max DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Qwen3.7 Flash