token.app › Compare › DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Qwen3.7 Flash

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is 8.2× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
DeepSeek V3.1 TerminusQwen3.7 Flash
ProviderDeepSeekAlibaba
Input $/1M$0.270$0.030
Output $/1M$1.00$0.130
Blended $/1M$0.453$0.055
Context window164K1M
Max output147K66K
ReleasedSep 2025Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus if…
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.453 blended
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.453 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.270 vs $0.030. Output alone: $1.00 vs $0.130.
What context windows do DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus: 163,840 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Qwen3.7 Flash?
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is made by DeepSeek. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus full details Qwen3.7 Flash full details DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Flint (free) DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Glimpse DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B