token.app › Compare › DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Qwen3.7 Flash
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is 5.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| DeepSeek V3.2 Exp | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $0.270 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $0.410 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.305 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 164K | 1M |
| Max output | 66K | 66K |
| Released | Sep 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose DeepSeek V3.2 Exp if…
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.305 blended
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is DeepSeek V3.2 Exp cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.305 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.270 vs $0.030. Output alone: $0.410 vs $0.130.
What context windows do DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: 163,840 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Qwen3.7 Flash?
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp is made by DeepSeek. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons