token.app › Compare › DeepSeek V3.2 vs Gemma 4 31B
DeepSeek V3.2 vs Gemma 4 31B
Gemma 4 31B leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Gemma 4 31B is 1.8× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemma 4 31B accepts the larger context window (262K).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| DeepSeek V3.2 | Gemma 4 31B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | |
| Input $/1M | $0.260 | $0.100 |
| Output $/1M | $0.380 | $0.340 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.290 | $0.160 |
| Context window | 164K | 262K |
| Max output | 164K | 262K |
| Released | Dec 2025 | Apr 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
| GPQA Diamond | 71.2% | 75.8% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 48.9% | 73.3% |
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose DeepSeek V3.2 if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Gemma 4 31B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.160 vs $0.290 blended
- Higher GPQA Diamond (75.8% vs 71.2%)
- Higher OTIS Mock AIME (73.3% vs 48.9%)
- Larger context window (262K)
- Newer model (released Apr 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, DeepSeek V3.2 or Gemma 4 31B?
Across the 2 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, DeepSeek V3.2 leads on 0 and Gemma 4 31B leads on 2. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is DeepSeek V3.2 cheaper than Gemma 4 31B?
Gemma 4 31B is cheaper: $0.160 versus $0.290 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.260 vs $0.100. Output alone: $0.380 vs $0.340.
What context windows do DeepSeek V3.2 and Gemma 4 31B have?
DeepSeek V3.2: 163,840 tokens. Gemma 4 31B: 262,144 tokens.
Who makes DeepSeek V3.2 and Gemma 4 31B?
DeepSeek V3.2 is made by DeepSeek. Gemma 4 31B is made by Google.