token.app › Compare › DeepSeek V3.2 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
DeepSeek V3.2 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is 5.3× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| DeepSeek V3.2 | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $0.260 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $0.380 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.290 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 164K | 1M |
| Max output | 164K | 66K |
| Released | Dec 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose DeepSeek V3.2 if…
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.290 blended
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, DeepSeek V3.2 or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both DeepSeek V3.2 and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is DeepSeek V3.2 cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.290 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.260 vs $0.030. Output alone: $0.380 vs $0.130.
What context windows do DeepSeek V3.2 and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
DeepSeek V3.2: 163,840 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes DeepSeek V3.2 and Qwen3.7 Flash?
DeepSeek V3.2 is made by DeepSeek. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.