token.app › Compare › DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Qwen3.7 Flash

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is 18× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Qwen3.7 Flash
ProviderDeepSeekAlibaba
Input $/1M$0.660$0.030
Output $/1M$1.98$0.130
Blended $/1M$0.990$0.055
Context window1.0M1M
Max output393K66K
ReleasedAug 2026Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.990 blended
FAQ
Which is better, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.990 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.660 vs $0.030. Output alone: $1.98 vs $0.130.
What context windows do DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Qwen3.7 Flash?
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is made by DeepSeek. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 full details Qwen3.7 Flash full details DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Flint (free) DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Glimpse DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B