token.app › Compare › DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM 5.2
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM 5.2
GLM 5.2 leads on 4 of 6 shared benchmarks. GLM 5.2 is 1.4× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis.
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | GLM 5.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Zhipu AI |
| Input $/1M | $0.435 | $0.252 |
| Output $/1M | $0.870 | $0.792 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.544 | $0.387 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Max output | 384K | 128K |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Jun 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
| GPQA Diamond | 90.9% | 91.9% |
| SWE-bench Verified | 77.6% | 78.7% |
| FrontierMath T1–3 | 45.3% | 59.2% |
| FrontierMath T4 | 2.4% | 29.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 57.0% | 38.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 96.7% | 86.4% |
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose DeepSeek V4 Pro if…
- Higher SimpleQA Verified (57.0% vs 38.1%)
- Higher OTIS Mock AIME (96.7% vs 86.4%)
Choose GLM 5.2 if…
- Costs less per token — $0.387 vs $0.544 blended
- Higher GPQA Diamond (91.9% vs 90.9%)
- Higher SWE-bench Verified (78.7% vs 77.6%)
- Higher FrontierMath T1–3 (59.2% vs 45.3%)
- Higher FrontierMath T4 (29.3% vs 2.4%)
- Newer model (released Jun 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, DeepSeek V4 Pro or GLM 5.2?
Across the 6 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, DeepSeek V4 Pro leads on 2 and GLM 5.2 leads on 4. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is DeepSeek V4 Pro cheaper than GLM 5.2?
GLM 5.2 is cheaper: $0.387 versus $0.544 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.435 vs $0.252. Output alone: $0.870 vs $0.792.
What context windows do DeepSeek V4 Pro and GLM 5.2 have?
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 1,048,576 tokens. GLM 5.2: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes DeepSeek V4 Pro and GLM 5.2?
DeepSeek V4 Pro is made by DeepSeek. GLM 5.2 is made by Zhipu AI.