token.app › Compare › Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.7 Flash is 15× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 2.5 Flash accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | |
| Input $/1M | $0.300 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $2.50 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.850 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1M |
| Max output | 66K | 66K |
| Released | Jun 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 70.8% | 86.7% |
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.850 blended
- Higher OTIS Mock AIME (86.7% vs 70.8%)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Qwen3.7 Flash?
Across the 1 benchmark both models have independently-run scores for, Gemini 2.5 Flash leads on 0 and Qwen3.7 Flash leads on 1. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.850 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.300 vs $0.030. Output alone: $2.50 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Gemini 2.5 Flash is made by Google. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons