token.app › Compare › Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is 15× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 2.5 Flash accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | |
| Input $/1M | $0.300 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $2.50 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.850 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1M |
| Max output | 66K | 66K |
| Released | Jun 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.850 blended
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.850 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.300 vs $0.030. Output alone: $2.50 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Gemini 2.5 Flash and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Gemini 2.5 Flash is made by Google. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons