token.app › Compare › Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch) vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch) vs GPT-5.6 Luna

GPT-5.6 Luna is 7.6× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. GPT-5.6 Luna accepts the larger context window (1.1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch)GPT-5.6 Luna
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Input $/1M$0.625$0.100
Output $/1M$5.00$0.600
Blended $/1M$1.72$0.225
Context window1.0M1.1M
Max output66K128K
ReleasedJun 2025Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose GPT-5.6 Luna if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.225 vs $1.72 blended
  • Larger context window (1.1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch) or GPT-5.6 Luna?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch) and GPT-5.6 Luna, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch) cheaper than GPT-5.6 Luna?
GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper: $0.225 versus $1.72 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.625 vs $0.100. Output alone: $5.00 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch) and GPT-5.6 Luna have?
Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch): 1,048,576 tokens. GPT-5.6 Luna: 1,050,000 tokens.
Who makes Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch) and GPT-5.6 Luna?
Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch) is made by Google. GPT-5.6 Luna is made by OpenAI.
Related comparisons
Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch) full details GPT-5.6 Luna full details Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch) vs Muse Spark 1.2 Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch) vs Qwen3.8 Max Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch) vs Inkling Small