token.app › Compare › Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is 31× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch) accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch)Qwen3.7 Flash
ProviderGoogleAlibaba
Input $/1M$0.625$0.030
Output $/1M$5.00$0.130
Blended $/1M$1.72$0.055
Context window1.0M1M
Max output66K66K
ReleasedJun 2025Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch) if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $1.72 blended
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch) or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch) cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $1.72 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.625 vs $0.030. Output alone: $5.00 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch): 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch) is made by Google. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons
Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch) full details Qwen3.7 Flash full details Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch) vs Muse Spark 1.2 Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch) vs Qwen3.8 Max Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Gemini 2.5 Pro (batch) vs Inkling Small