token.app › Compare › Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is 63× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 2.5 Pro accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | |
| Input $/1M | $1.25 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $10.00 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $3.44 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1M |
| Max output | 66K | 66K |
| Released | Jun 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $3.44 blended
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $3.44 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $1.25 vs $0.030. Output alone: $10.00 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Gemini 2.5 Pro is made by Google. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.