token.app › Compare › Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) vs Mercury 3

Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) vs Mercury 3

Mercury 3 is 3.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Mercury 3 accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image)Mercury 3
ProviderGoogleInception
Input $/1M$0.250$0.100
Output $/1M$1.50$0.350
Blended $/1M$0.563$0.163
Context window66K1M
Max output59K131K
ReleasedJun 2026Oct 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Mercury 3 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.163 vs $0.563 blended
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) or Mercury 3?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and Mercury 3, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) cheaper than Mercury 3?
Mercury 3 is cheaper: $0.163 versus $0.563 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.250 vs $0.100. Output alone: $1.50 vs $0.350.
What context windows do Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and Mercury 3 have?
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image): 65,536 tokens. Mercury 3: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) and Mercury 3?
Nano Banana 2 Lite (Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image) is made by Google. Mercury 3 is made by Inception.
Related comparisons