token.app › Compare › Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (batch) vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (batch) vs GPT-5.6 Luna

GPT-5.6 Luna is 10× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. GPT-5.6 Luna accepts the larger context window (1.1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (batch)GPT-5.6 Luna
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Input $/1M$1.00$0.100
Output $/1M$6.00$0.600
Blended $/1M$2.25$0.225
Context window1.0M1.1M
Max output66K128K
ReleasedFeb 2026Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (batch) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose GPT-5.6 Luna if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.225 vs $2.25 blended
  • Larger context window (1.1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (batch) or GPT-5.6 Luna?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (batch) and GPT-5.6 Luna, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (batch) cheaper than GPT-5.6 Luna?
GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper: $0.225 versus $2.25 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $1.00 vs $0.100. Output alone: $6.00 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (batch) and GPT-5.6 Luna have?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (batch): 1,048,576 tokens. GPT-5.6 Luna: 1,050,000 tokens.
Who makes Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (batch) and GPT-5.6 Luna?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (batch) is made by Google. GPT-5.6 Luna is made by OpenAI.
Related comparisons
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (batch) full details GPT-5.6 Luna full details Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (batch) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (batch) vs Muse Spark 1.2 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (batch) vs Qwen3.8 Max Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (batch) vs Inkling Small