token.app › Compare › Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is 7.7× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch)Qwen3.7 Flash
ProviderGoogleAlibaba
Input $/1M$0.150$0.030
Output $/1M$1.25$0.130
Blended $/1M$0.425$0.055
Context window1.0M1M
Max output66K66K
ReleasedJul 2026Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.425 blended
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.425 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.150 vs $0.030. Output alone: $1.25 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch): 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) is made by Google. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) full details Qwen3.7 Flash full details Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) vs Flint (free) Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) vs Glimpse Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B