token.app › Compare › Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 3.2× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis.

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProviderGoogleDeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.300$0.150
Output $/1M$2.50$0.600
Blended $/1M$0.850$0.262
Context window1.0M1.0M
Max output66K393K
ReleasedJul 2026Oct 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.262 vs $0.850 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is cheaper: $0.262 versus $0.850 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.300 vs $0.150. Output alone: $2.50 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 1,048,576 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is made by Google. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite full details DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 full details Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Flint (free) Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Glimpse Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Mercury 3