token.app › Compare › Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Gemini 3.5 Flash leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.7 Flash is 61× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.5 Flash accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | |
| Input $/1M | $1.50 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $9.00 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $3.38 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 1.0M | 1M |
| Max output | 66K | 66K |
| Released | May 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| GPQA Diamond | 92.8% | 82.3% |
| FrontierMath T1–3 | 62.8% | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 95.6% | 86.7% |
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash if…
- Higher GPQA Diamond (92.8% vs 82.3%)
- Higher FrontierMath T1–3 (62.8% vs 19.3%)
- Higher OTIS Mock AIME (95.6% vs 86.7%)
- Larger context window (1.0M)
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $3.38 blended
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Qwen3.7 Flash?
Across the 3 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, Gemini 3.5 Flash leads on 3 and Qwen3.7 Flash leads on 0. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $3.38 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $1.50 vs $0.030. Output alone: $9.00 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Gemini 3.5 Flash and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Gemini 3.5 Flash and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Gemini 3.5 Flash is made by Google. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons