token.app › Compare › Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is 55× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.6 Flash accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Gemini 3.6 FlashQwen3.7 Flash
ProviderGoogleAlibaba
Input $/1M$1.50$0.030
Output $/1M$7.50$0.130
Blended $/1M$3.00$0.055
Context window1.0M1M
Max output66K66K
ReleasedJul 2026Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Gemini 3.6 Flash if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $3.00 blended
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Gemini 3.6 Flash and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Gemini 3.6 Flash cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $1.50 vs $0.030. Output alone: $7.50 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Gemini 3.6 Flash and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Gemini 3.6 Flash and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Gemini 3.6 Flash is made by Google. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons