token.app › Compare › Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 2.9× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis.

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch)DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProviderGoogleDeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.375$0.150
Output $/1M$1.88$0.600
Blended $/1M$0.750$0.262
Context window1.0M1.0M
Max output66K393K
ReleasedAug 2026Oct 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.262 vs $0.750 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is cheaper: $0.262 versus $0.750 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.375 vs $0.150. Output alone: $1.88 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch): 1,048,576 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) is made by Google. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons
Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) full details DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 full details Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Flint (free) Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Glimpse Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Mercury 3