token.app › Compare › Gemini 4 Argon (batch) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Gemini 4 Argon (batch) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 7.6× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis.

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Gemini 4 Argon (batch)DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProviderGoogleDeepSeek
Input $/1M$1.00$0.150
Output $/1M$5.00$0.600
Blended $/1M$2.00$0.262
Context window1.0M1.0M
Max output944K393K
ReleasedOct 2026Oct 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Gemini 4 Argon (batch) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.262 vs $2.00 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Gemini 4 Argon (batch) or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Gemini 4 Argon (batch) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Gemini 4 Argon (batch) cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is cheaper: $0.262 versus $2.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $1.00 vs $0.150. Output alone: $5.00 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Gemini 4 Argon (batch) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Gemini 4 Argon (batch): 1,048,576 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Gemini 4 Argon (batch) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Gemini 4 Argon (batch) is made by Google. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons