token.app › Compare › Gemma 4 31B vs Inkling

Gemma 4 31B vs Inkling

Inkling leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Gemma 4 31B is 7.0× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Inkling accepts the larger context window (524K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Gemma 4 31BInkling
ProviderGoogleThinkingmachines
Input $/1M$0.200$1.00
Output $/1M$0.400$4.05
Blended $/1M$0.250$1.76
Context window262K524K
Max output16K472K
ReleasedApr 2026Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
GPQA Diamond 75.8% 88.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 73.3% 88.9%
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Gemma 4 31B if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.250 vs $1.76 blended
Choose Inkling if…
  • Higher GPQA Diamond (88.3% vs 75.8%)
  • Higher OTIS Mock AIME (88.9% vs 73.3%)
  • Larger context window (524K)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Gemma 4 31B or Inkling?
Across the 2 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, Gemma 4 31B leads on 0 and Inkling leads on 2. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is Gemma 4 31B cheaper than Inkling?
Gemma 4 31B is cheaper: $0.250 versus $1.76 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.200 vs $1.00. Output alone: $0.400 vs $4.05.
What context windows do Gemma 4 31B and Inkling have?
Gemma 4 31B: 262,144 tokens. Inkling: 524,288 tokens.
Who makes Gemma 4 31B and Inkling?
Gemma 4 31B is made by Google. Inkling is made by Thinkingmachines.
Related comparisons