token.app › Compare › Gemma 4 31B vs Inkling Small
Gemma 4 31B vs Inkling Small
Inkling Small leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Gemma 4 31B is 2.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Inkling Small accepts the larger context window (524K).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Gemma 4 31B | Inkling Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Thinkingmachines | |
| Input $/1M | $0.200 | $0.450 |
| Output $/1M | $0.400 | $1.20 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.250 | $0.637 |
| Context window | 262K | 524K |
| Max output | 16K | 262K |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
| GPQA Diamond | 75.8% | 88.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 73.3% | 90.0% |
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Gemma 4 31B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.250 vs $0.637 blended
Choose Inkling Small if…
- Higher GPQA Diamond (88.5% vs 75.8%)
- Higher OTIS Mock AIME (90.0% vs 73.3%)
- Larger context window (524K)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Gemma 4 31B or Inkling Small?
Across the 2 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, Gemma 4 31B leads on 0 and Inkling Small leads on 2. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is Gemma 4 31B cheaper than Inkling Small?
Gemma 4 31B is cheaper: $0.250 versus $0.637 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.200 vs $0.450. Output alone: $0.400 vs $1.20.
What context windows do Gemma 4 31B and Inkling Small have?
Gemma 4 31B: 262,144 tokens. Inkling Small: 524,288 tokens.
Who makes Gemma 4 31B and Inkling Small?
Gemma 4 31B is made by Google. Inkling Small is made by Thinkingmachines.